SLRP: LXXIII. On Philosophers And Kings (Part 2: 9 – 16)

Standard

Dear Seneca,

There is a conflict in your letter.  The second half speaks of the things which the philosopher enjoys:  namely prohairetic things.  But the first half is rather focused on aprohairetic things, externals.

The focus of goodness is right and just, but was Diogenes of Sinope not good?  Does not Epictetus hold him up as a possible Sage? Indeed he does:  he does this without property, without the civil citizenship.  He shuns the state, tries to teach Alexander as a man, not a King.  He is a citizen in the cosmic city of the gods, of the wise, of πήρα.

I think, sir, with all due respect that your wealth and position have clouded your judgement on this issue.

Farewell.


Part of Michel Daw’s Reading Plan of Seneca’s Letters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s